REJUVA KARE / TRICHOLOGY

Clinical Case Studies

Explore documented observations from Rejuva Kare's supportive hair and scalp care. These cases are shared to inform patients, referring clinicians, and professional partners about the clinic's care model and its limitations.

Case observations are not controlled research and do not guarantee outcomes for other individuals.

CASE STUDY 001

Supportive Trichological Care in a Patient with CCCA

Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia (CCCA)

CARE PERIODJanuary 23, 2024 – August 2026 · Approximately 31 months
CARE MODELBiweekly, referral-based supportive care alongside medical management

Single-patient observational documentation of supportive scalp and hair care provided alongside—not in place of—medical management for previously diagnosed CCCA.

Top-down scalp photograph at baseline
BaselineOctober 5, 2024
Follow-up photograph of scalp and hair coverage
Follow-upAugust 2026 · approximately 22 months later

Photographs were selected and cropped for framing and privacy, without scalp or hair appearance retouching. Lighting, angle, hair styling and length were not standardized and can affect apparent density.

Supportive care approach

Trichological scalp and hair assessments at each visit; review of client-provided information within professional scope; nutrition and lifestyle education; referral or coordination with licensed professionals as appropriate; individualized topical protocol and micro-mist/steam care; and serial photographic monitoring.

Observed outcome

Comparison of the October 5, 2024 baseline with August 2026 follow-up photographs showed increased visible hair coverage and reduced scalp exposure in portions of the central and vertex scalp, with residual thinning at the crown.

Read clinical context and limitations

Clinical interpretation

Visible improvement does not show regeneration of follicles destroyed by scarring. Findings describe increased visible coverage during coordinated supportive care, not histological reversal of scarring alopecia.

Limitations

This is a single-patient, uncontrolled observational case with concurrent interventions; individual effects cannot be isolated. Photography was not standardized and no trichoscopic or other quantitative measurements were used.

For referring clinicians

Shared to support continuity of care and communication with treating clinicians. It does not substitute for dermatologic assessment of disease activity or justify conclusions about medical disease status without direct clinical evaluation.

CLINICAL COLLABORATION

For referring or treating clinicians, additional documentation may be available on request, subject to patient privacy and appropriate authorization.

Case summaries describe supportive trichological care and observational findings. They do not constitute a medical diagnosis, replace medical or dermatologic management, demonstrate treatment efficacy, or predict individual results.